“Pehli baar mohabbat ki hai, Aakhiri baar mohabbat ki hai” sung by Mohit Chauhan from the movie "Kaminey" is my recent favourite. It becomes real tempting to hear the song as it proceeds with the short piano piece.
The lyrcis goes as:
Thode bheege bheege se thode nam hain humKal se soye huwe bhi to kam hain humDil ne kaise harkat ki haiPehli baar mohabbat ki haiAakhri baar mohabbat ki haiAankhein doobi doobi si surmayee madhamJheelein paani paani hai, bas tum aur humBaat badi hairat ki haiPehli baar mohabbat ki haiAakhiri baar mohabbat ki haiKhwaab ke bhoj seKap kapati huwiHalki palke teriyaad aata hai sabtujhe gud gudanasatanayunhin sotey huwegaal pey teepna..meechna..bewajah besababYaad haipeepal ke jiske ghane saaye thehumnein gilhari ke jhhootey matar khaaye theyyeh barqat un hazrat ki haiPehli baar mohabbat ki haiAakhri baar mohabbat ki hai..
Sunday, August 30, 2009
MY RECENT FAVOURITE SONG!
ASSET-BASED MAT-A BANE?
MAT (Minimum Alternate Tax) was introduced in 1983 because of the replication of the zero-tax paying company's strategy of the US in India. Plenty of Companies in the USA with huge pre-tax profits did not pay any tax at all! They used to declare huge dividends and escaped contributing to the fiscal income of the country. This seemed irrational, and hence various forms of MAT (AMT in USA) were introduced in various countries including India, USA, Mexico, etc, which was widely appreciated.
In India, the history of MAT from "deemed total income" to "deemed tax" to the current proposed "asset based" tax is as follows:
· Introduction of section 80VVA in 1983 which laid down certain restrictions on aggregate amount of deduction allowed from the total income and was applicable for AY 1984-85 to 1987-88.
· Then, section 115J was introduced on 1st April 1988 under which if the total income was less than 30% of the book profits, the total income charged to profits was 30% of the book profits. This was in operation for AY 1988-89 to 1990-91.
· In 1991-92, with a view to rationalize the tax structure, and discontinuance of Investment incentives, MAT was phased out.
· After 6 years, MAT was introduced in AY 1997-98 under section 115 JA.
· In the next year, in 1998-99, section 115 JAA was introduced to give effect to tax credit scheme by which tax paid under MAT was allowed to be carried forward for set-off against regular tax paid in subsequent 5 years.
· In 2000, another section 115 JB was introduced. Rather than computing "deemed total income", the focus was on introducing "deemed tax" for the computation of minimum deemed tax. The provision for credit under section 115 JJA was discontinued. MAT @ 7.5% of book profits was levied including surcharge.
· In 2005, Tax credit was again allowed under MAT.
· In 2006-07, MAT was increased from 7.5% to 10%, and the credit period increased from 5 years to 7 years.
· In 2007-08, this 11.33% tax was applied to IT companies which so far, have been exempt. Also, it was extended to some exempted export incomes.
· Finally, the MAT was increased from 10% to 15%.
With a view to rationalize the tax structure, the new tax code 2009, applicable from April 2011, brings out a radical change in the computation of MAT. It now would be 2% of the Gross Assets (Net Fixed Assets plus all assets excluding negative balance of P/L Account). The similar rates for banks would be .5%.
This seems to be completely absurd, and is bad news for the highly capital intensive companies like infrastructure or manufacturing and even IT companies. Recently, my VP had asked to study the impact of the new guidelines on one the projects we had appraised, and to my surprise, this MAT (terminology-wise) is no more "minimum". Infact, the normal corporate tax was much lower than MAT. Given, this new provision, the question of taking higher of the two, I presume, should not apply. But, the guidelines propose the higher of the two, which again defeats the original intent behind the introduction of MAT.
The Govt calls it a revenue neutral proposal, which, to my understanding is not so. MAT would force companies to pay tax inspite of their inability to pay! Since assets and ones profitability is de-linked, there could be a case where the Company is forced to pay huge MAT inspite of no/-ve pre-tax profits. Further, even the provision of phasing out of credit provision is being proposed in the bill. Thus, loss making infrastructure behind would be required to pay MAT, inspite of their inability. So, it would emerge as a huge bane. However, there seems to be little possibility of it going through.
WHAT IS LOVE?
The post cannot give a foolproof definition of "Love" but can offer a perspective on it.
Recently, I read this book-"Road Less Travelled" by M. Scott Peck and gathered different insights on the concept of love, traditional values and spiritual growth. I have coupled it with my understanding of the reading and for the purpose of the post have focused on aspects of love and spiritual growth only.
The definition of love (as per the web definition by goggling) is a strong positive emotion of regard and affection. But, this seems to be real generic definition. As per my understanding, the definition could be unique, and very specific to the individual. It is not definitely difficult to arrive at the consensus on the definition, nor is that required.
In order to explore more on a possible definition, the writer has asked some questions (including some of my thoughts) as-Can we love two people at a time? How long does the feeling of love remain? Why do people end up breaking-up after being committed to each other for some time? Does the feeling of love requires two people to stay together or is love all about separateness? Is love about sacrifice for the good of the other person? Is it essential to marry the person you love? and the list goes on.
M Scott defines love as "The will to extend one's self for the purpose of nurturing one's own or another's spiritual growth". Spiritual growth would mean reaching close to God..in simple terms as I understand it, it would mean becoming a better person.
So, love is not emotional attachment or dependency as per him but more of volition (a genuine will/cognitive process where one decides and commits to some course of action). For him, "commitment" is the most important thing for genuine love and not romantic love (which is mere expression of one's love for the other person, and may be, stems from physical needs). It is impossible to understand the other person without making room for the other person within ourselves, so, commitment is a pre-requisite for the same.
Also, falling is love is not an act of love, but temporary collapse of our egos to merge his/her identity with the other person, and its sudden release is the cause of all damage. When individual realize that each of the individual's have different likes, dislikes, desires, and they are not one individual, then it becomes difficult for them to accept the same, and may be, the cause of most break-ups.
I have always wondered that this feeling of love (as I hear it) should be a short-term process and must be lost after some point of time, and which may be, in author's language be the instance of realization by the individuals of their separate identity after they regain from the collapsed egos. But, the fact of the matter is that if two people like each other (not just as an emotional attachment), and see themselves as better person, then this phenomenon is no more a short-term process. As far as the dependency is less, it should not result in any complexities. And overtime, making love could be an act of expression of one's love. But, any relationship of love that is out of mere physical attraction is bound to suffer because making love is not an act of love but mere lust, as per the author.
Moreover, he also points out that marrying the person one loves is just a decision by the two of them and should not be an obligation. The two people who love each other might end up marrying because they see one's spiritual growth by being together. He talks of the concept of "open marriage" which I find difficult to accept and have not delved much into it. It is also more of a societal issue. The society we have, does not propagate such acts and our mind-sets are also similar.
Answering as to why people in genuine love do not wish being open with disclosing their feelings to the other person, he says, that we are all resistant to change. We all want "status quo" and are not willing to accept more responsibilities and hence do not want to be true to ourselves. But, he talks of the power of being true to oneself, and reading our mind, thoughts, feeling and ideas. In this context, he talks of the importance of dreams/unconscious self, which should be explored. We have 5% of the mind as the conscious self and the rest is the unconscious one, and hence, we should take out time to understand our unconscious self (dreams), give importance to any weird thought that come to our mind.
We can be psychotherapists to self provided we are willing to accept changes.
Sunday, August 23, 2009
PHIR MILENGE!
Saturday, August 15, 2009
Express Yourself!

"People often feel something but express something else.They mean something but say something else..So learn the art of saying nothing in such a way that it leaves nothing unsaid…"
Sunday, August 9, 2009
Missing Home
Wednesday, August 5, 2009
WHAT NEXT!!
Sunday, August 2, 2009
Happy Friendship Day :)
Saturday, August 1, 2009
How Romantic !!

My latest addiction is:
A. R. Rahman's song from Delhi 6.
It goes like this:
rehna tu hai jaisa tu
thoda sa dard tu thoda sukun
rehna tu hai jaisa tu
dheema dheema jhonka ya phir junu
thoda sa resham tu humdum thoda sa khurdara
kabhi to ad jaye ya lad jaye ya khushboo se bhara
tujhe badalna na chahoon ratti bhar bhi sanam
bina sajawat milawat na zyada na hi kum
tujhe chahooon jaisa hain tu
mujhe teri barish main bhigna hai ghul jana hai
tujhe chahoon saahey
mujhe teri lapat main jalna rakh ho jana hai
tu zakhm de gar
marham bhi aake tu lagaye
zakhm pe bhi mujhko pyar aaye
dariya o mere yaar
doobne de mujhey dariya
rehna tu hai jisa tu
thoda sa dard tu thoda sukun
rehna tu hai jaisa tu
dheema dheema jhonka ya phir junu
haath thaam chalna ho
toh dono ke dayein haath sang kaise
haath thaam chalna ho
toh dono ke dayein haath sang kaise
ek dayain aage hoga ek bayain hoga
thaam le haath ye thaam le
chalna hai sang thaam le
rehna tu hai jisa tu
thoda sa dard tu thoda sukun
rehna tu… hai jaisa tu
dheema dheema jhonka ya phir junu
thoda sa resham tu humdum thoda sa khurdara
kabhi to ad jaye ya lad jaye ya khushboo se bhara
tujhe badalna na chahoon ratti bhar bhi sanam
bina sajawat milawat na zyada na hi kum
tujhe chahooon jaisa hain tu
mujhe teri barish main bhigna hai ghul jana hai
tujhe chahoon saahey
mujhe teri lapat main jalane rakh ho jana hai
People (in love or otherwise too) need not change themselves to please others, and this expression has been amazingly brought out in the song. It sends across the message that "STAY AS YOU ARE", and I am simply addicted to this song :)

